{"schema":"sb.truth.v1","subject":"diplomacy-nato","title":"The Diplomacy: NATO record","tier":"standard","tierNote":"Standard-tier record, generated from the maintained event registry: reporting, our coverage metric, market expectation, and state history. No primary-source layer yet — first-party issuer verification is what upgrades a record to full tier, the discipline the hormuz record demonstrates.","asOf":"2026-08-08","generatedAt":"2026-08-08T23:26:25.200604+00:00","tracked":true,"access":"Free — no key, no charge. Serves at GET /api/truth/diplomacy-nato and answers the get_truth_object MCP tool. (No exhibit page for standard-tier records yet — the API and MCP responses ARE the record.)","attribution":"Cite 'Signal Bureau' with https://signalbureau.ai/api/truth/diplomacy-nato so readers can verify.","layers":{"primarySources":{"label":"Observed operational state","status":"absent","basis":"not present on a standard-tier record — no first-party issuer has been routed for this subject yet; nothing here is previewed to look finished","sources":[]},"reporting":{"label":"Observed reporting","basis":"attributed sources — outside coverage in our tracked set; verify at the source","items":[{"title":"Russia could attack Nato within weeks, US intelligence warns","url":"https://old.reddit.com/r/geopolitics/comments/1vhwe6t/russia_could_attack_nato_within_weeks_us/","tier":"social/aggregator","kind":"reporting — attributed; verify at the source"},{"title":"Exclusive | U.S. Intel Finds Putin Could Test NATO’s Resolve With Limited Incursion","url":"https://old.reddit.com/r/geopolitics/comments/1vhta78/exclusive_us_intel_finds_putin_could_test_natos/","tier":"social/aggregator","kind":"reporting — attributed; verify at the source"},{"title":"US Intelligence Warns Putin Could Invade NATO While Still Fighting Ukraine","url":"https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1vhw80w/us_intelligence_warns_putin_could_invade_nato/","tier":"social/aggregator","kind":"reporting — attributed; verify at the source"},{"title":"NATO intern accused of spying reported working a range of Canadian government jobs","url":"https://old.reddit.com/r/Intelligence/comments/1vh0e35/nato_intern_accused_of_spying_reported_working_a/","tier":"social/aggregator","kind":"reporting — attributed; verify at the source"}]},"record":{"label":"The record itself","basis":"our own count of documents we ingested and can name — not a claim about the world, and market questions are excluded because a question is not reporting","documents":156,"outlets":39,"activeDays":24,"firstSeen":"2026-05-18","lastSeen":"2026-08-07","homeDomains":["turkey","aerospace_defense"],"asserts":{"military-action":19,"meeting-visit":13,"utterance":9,"launch-release":5,"regulatory-approval":2,"acquisition":2},"assertionCoverage":0.34,"movesWith":[{"label":"russia","n":59,"sharedDomains":[]},{"label":"ukraine","n":56,"sharedDomains":[]},{"label":"saudi arabia","n":25,"sharedDomains":["turkey"]},{"label":"iran","n":46,"sharedDomains":[]},{"label":"trump","n":38,"sharedDomains":[]},{"label":"united states","n":35,"sharedDomains":[]},{"label":"nuclear","n":32,"sharedDomains":[]},{"label":"israel","n":26,"sharedDomains":[]}],"provenance":"curated"},"coverageMetric":{"label":"Coverage state","basis":"our own measurement — our attention, not the event's state","direction":"rising","baselineRelativePct":104,"reading":"Our coverage of Diplomacy: NATO is 104% above its 3-week baseline. This measures our attention — how much our tracked set is writing about it — not the event itself.","trackedDays":86,"eventMentions":81,"periods":[{"period":"2026","mentions":81}]},"market":{"label":"Market expectation","basis":"attributed — markets price collective belief about defined outcomes; belief, not fact, and never proof that an event occurred","current":[],"arc":[],"eventArc":{"name":"Diplomacy: NATO","slug":"diplomacy-nato","questionCount":2,"questions":["Will JD Vance attend NATO Summit?","Will Marco Rubio attend NATO Summit?"],"mentions":81,"firstSeen":"2026-06-03","lastSeen":"2026-07-10"}},"judgment":{"label":"Our reading","basis":"derived judgment — our reading over the layers above; ours, and labeled ours","asOf":"2026-08-08","text":"A standard-tier record keeps its layers apart and does not collapse them. Our coverage metric measures our attention; the reporting is attributed, not verified against first-party issuers; the market layer prices belief, not fact. Reading any single layer as \"the answer\" is how a machine gets this wrong — and this record's honest limit is stated in its tier: no primary-source layer exists here yet."},"consensus":{"label":"Reporting consensus","basis":"retroactive claims ledger — kernel facts scored by independent-chain agreement","pending":true,"note":"No claims ledger has been computed for this subject yet — consensus scoring is full-tier machinery."},"stateHistory":{"label":"State history","basis":"recorded transitions — never edited after the fact","transitions":[{"field":"coverage state","from":"fading","to":"steady","at":"2026-08-03T15:44:09.453412+00:00","heldSince":"2026-07-19T04:02:08.330742+00:00"},{"field":"coverage state","from":"steady","to":"rising","at":"2026-08-07T15:06:56.050386+00:00","heldSince":"2026-08-03T15:44:09.453412+00:00"}]}}}